Because of this story I’m going to call my local shelter and start snapping photos!
This Is All Kinds Of Wrong of the Day: That something as simple as a good photograph can increase the likelihood of an abandoned dog being adopted is well documented.
Emily Tanen had witnessed the effects of a professional photoshoot on an unwanted dog’s chances first hand during her time at the Manhattan branch of Animal Care and Control of New York City, when she took it upon herself to upgrade the shelter operator’s disposable camera to her own $1,500 Nikon, only to see the number of rescued dogs increase.
Hired as a liaison between ACCNYC and the groups that rescue shelter animals, Tanen says she was eventually fired for going out of her way to take better photos of pit bulls in a last-ditch effort to save them from being euthanized.
Tanen was told that she had violated the policy that prohibits photographing the dogs interacting with humans.
“I think they just didn’t want photos of animals that they were about to kill looking cute and adoptable and happy with people,” she says, “but they said it was because their research showed that photos with people didn’t encourage people to adopt.”
Sadly, for many of the dogs in ACCNYC’s care, Tanen was the last line of defense. Rescue groups would often be persuaded by her photos to take animals they would otherwise have passed on.
“I still remember Domino’s photo — the first pit bull we pulled from Manhattan,” Dog Habitat Rescue founder Jay Lombard said. “He was within 12 hours of being destroyed when Emily snapped a photo of him and attached it to an e-mail. That image hit me hard and I couldn’t turn away.”
Above: Compare Tanen’s handiwork with the ACCNYC’s sorry excuse for a snapshot.
-
shiegra likes this
-
rowdydugan likes this
-
chirpinhard reblogged this from burpinhard
-
littleraynoffire reblogged this from mrs-andy
-
mrs-andy reblogged this from thedailywhat
-
toschetizzy likes this
-
lenincestsrin likes this
-
kyou-wa-hare reblogged this from thedailywhat
-
kyou-wa-hare likes this
-
samgrim101 likes this
-
letsgogogo reblogged this from thedailywhat
-
anotherrrway reblogged this from fuckyeah-animalrights
-
lostboysleader likes this
-
esasidra reblogged this from thedailywhat
-
everythingiscolour reblogged this from desex-your-ecks
-
varicocele likes this
-
brittanymichael likes this
-
lifecametoahalt reblogged this from snoggered
-
lifecametoahalt likes this
-
claimsatconsciousness likes this
-
acanuck-eh reblogged this from thedailywhat
-
miss-mary-quite-contrary likes this
-
r2d2atyourservice likes this
-
absinthiumlacunae reblogged this from brashblacknonbeliever
-
sunnyskiesandbluetides reblogged this from button13
-
highlydosed reblogged this from hopefulveterinarian
-
ineedtoknowyou likes this
-
code-sumeragi reblogged this from fruitflying
-
code-sumeragi likes this
-
lovesolucky reblogged this from thedailywhat
-
morethanyouwannaknow reblogged this from nastyxvx
-
goodmorningmaxine reblogged this from thedailywhat
-
malfoyis-ourking reblogged this from thedailywhat and added:
“ALL KINDS OF WRONG”. Stupid bitches.
-
darthkaley likes this
-
kateblogthis likes this
-
master-of-phailure reblogged this from karlaaaxc
-
master-of-phailure likes this
-
karlaaaxc reblogged this from thedailywhat
-
sinspired-in-heaven reblogged this from thedailywhat
-
yournewfavoritesuperheroine reblogged this from sw0rdswllngwh0r and added:
I understand not wanting to see “your dog” interacting with another person intimately (it makes the subject of the photo...
-
jeffersonaraujo reblogged this from thedailywhat
-
ginazz likes this
-
yourlastsunday likes this
-
remadi reblogged this from kioko110
-
deniselle reblogged this from misohead
-
ilaeria reblogged this from sleepydumpling
-
cheeseeater reblogged this from thedailywhat
-
vallabenyapmadim likes this
- Show more notes

