Because of this story I’m going to call my local shelter and start snapping photos!

thedailywhat:

This Is All Kinds Of Wrong of the Day: That something as simple as a good photograph can increase the likelihood of an abandoned dog being adopted is well documented.
Emily Tanen had witnessed the effects of a professional photoshoot on an unwanted dog’s chances first hand during her time at the Manhattan branch of Animal Care and Control of New York City, when she took it upon herself to upgrade the shelter operator’s disposable camera to her own $1,500 Nikon, only to see the number of rescued dogs increase.
Hired as a liaison between ACCNYC and the groups that rescue shelter animals, Tanen says she was eventually fired for going out of her way to take better photos of pit bulls in a last-ditch effort to save them from being euthanized.
Tanen was told that she had violated the policy that prohibits photographing the dogs interacting with humans.
“I think they just didn’t want photos of animals that they were about to kill looking cute and adoptable and happy with people,” she says, “but they said it was because their research showed that photos with people didn’t encourage people to adopt.”
Sadly, for many of the dogs in ACCNYC’s care, Tanen was the last line of defense. Rescue groups would often be persuaded by her photos to take animals they would otherwise have passed on.
“I still remember Domino’s photo — the first pit bull we pulled from Manhattan,” Dog Habitat Rescue founder Jay Lombard said. “He was within 12 hours of being destroyed when Emily snapped a photo of him and attached it to an e-mail. That image hit me hard and I couldn’t turn away.”
Above: Compare Tanen’s handiwork with the ACCNYC’s sorry excuse for a snapshot.
[nyt / gizmodo.]

Because of this story I’m going to call my local shelter and start snapping photos!

thedailywhat:

This Is All Kinds Of Wrong of the Day: That something as simple as a good photograph can increase the likelihood of an abandoned dog being adopted is well documented.

Emily Tanen had witnessed the effects of a professional photoshoot on an unwanted dog’s chances first hand during her time at the Manhattan branch of Animal Care and Control of New York City, when she took it upon herself to upgrade the shelter operator’s disposable camera to her own $1,500 Nikon, only to see the number of rescued dogs increase.

Hired as a liaison between ACCNYC and the groups that rescue shelter animals, Tanen says she was eventually fired for going out of her way to take better photos of pit bulls in a last-ditch effort to save them from being euthanized.

Tanen was told that she had violated the policy that prohibits photographing the dogs interacting with humans.

“I think they just didn’t want photos of animals that they were about to kill looking cute and adoptable and happy with people,” she says, “but they said it was because their research showed that photos with people didn’t encourage people to adopt.”

Sadly, for many of the dogs in ACCNYC’s care, Tanen was the last line of defense. Rescue groups would often be persuaded by her photos to take animals they would otherwise have passed on.

“I still remember Domino’s photo — the first pit bull we pulled from Manhattan,” Dog Habitat Rescue founder Jay Lombard said. “He was within 12 hours of being destroyed when Emily snapped a photo of him and attached it to an e-mail. That image hit me hard and I couldn’t turn away.”

Above: Compare Tanen’s handiwork with the ACCNYC’s sorry excuse for a snapshot.

[nyt / gizmodo.]

09:33 pm, reblogged  by pamador2 2349
Notes
  1. chirpinhard reblogged this from burpinhard
  2. littleraynoffire reblogged this from nobodyelse-s
  3. nobodyelse-s reblogged this from thedailywhat
  4. kyou-wa-hare reblogged this from thedailywhat
  5. letsgogogo reblogged this from thedailywhat
  6. anotherrrway reblogged this from fuckyeah-animalrights
  7. esasidra reblogged this from thedailywhat
  8. everythingiscolour reblogged this from desex-your-ecks
  9. lifecametoahalt reblogged this from snoggered
  10. acanuck-eh reblogged this from thedailywhat
  11. absinthiumlacunae reblogged this from womanistgamergirl
  12. dimpledays reblogged this from button13
  13. button13 reblogged this from highlydosed
  14. highlydosed reblogged this from hopefulveterinarian
  15. code-sumeragi reblogged this from fruitflying
  16. lovesolucky reblogged this from thedailywhat
  17. morethanyouwannaknow reblogged this from sicksadqueervegan
  18. goodmorningmaxine reblogged this from thedailywhat
  19. leestine reblogged this from thedailywhat and added:
    “ALL KINDS OF WRONG”. Stupid bitches.
  20. master-of-phailure reblogged this from karlaaaxc
  21. karlaaaxc reblogged this from thedailywhat
  22. life--of--pan reblogged this from thedailywhat
  23. theravenbunnyswolfden reblogged this from sw0rdswllngwh0r and added:
    I understand not wanting to see “your dog” interacting with another person intimately (it makes the subject of the photo...
  24. jeffersonaraujo reblogged this from thedailywhat
  25. remadi reblogged this from kioko110
  26. deniselle reblogged this from misohead
  27. ilaeria reblogged this from sleepydumpling
  28. cheeseeater reblogged this from thedailywhat